Chapter Performance Awards (1962-2006)
In 1962, National Council began recognizing the top ten chapters for their rating in overall performance as measured by scholarship, campus activities, financial stability, alumni relations, and house activity. Starting in 1976, the rating was made automatically on the basis of data routinely submitted by undergraduate officers. Colonies were added in 1977 and alumni corporations were added in 1978, finally making it truly a chapter evaluation.
The first time a chapter won, it received a triangular wall plaque and an engraved pendant indicating rating and school year. Successive ratings and years in which they are won are recognized by additional pendants.
1962 | 1st: Marquette 2nd: Purdue 3rd: Penn State 4th: UCLA 5th: Clarkson 6th: Ohio State 7th: Wisconsin 8th: Missouri Mines 9th: Illinois 10th: Minnesota |
1963 | 1st: Purdue 2nd: Clarkson 3rd: Marquette 4th: Ohio State 5th: Penn State 6th: South Dakota Mines 7th: Illinois 8th: UCLA 9th: Wisconsin 10th: Michigan |
1964 | 1st: Marquette 2nd: Kansas 3rd: Clarkson 4th: Illinois 5th: Wisconsin 6th: UCLA (Only six chapters entered the competition) |
1965 | 1st: Marquette 2nd: Purdue 3rd: Minnesota 4th: Oklahoma State 5th: Wisconsin 6th: South Dakota Mines 7th: Iowa State 8th: Illinois 9th: Penn State 10th: Nebraska |
1966 | 1st: Marquette 2nd: Iowa State 3rd: Nebraska 4th: Purdue 5th: Illinois 6th: Penn State 7th: Oklahoma State 8th: Clarkson 9th: Mississippi State 10th: Kansas |
1967 | 1st: Marquette 2nd: Clarkson 3rd: Nebraska 4th: Wisconsin 5th: Kansas 6th: Kansas State 7th: UCLA 8th: Oklahoma State 9th: Michigan 10th: MSOE |
1968 | 1st: Kansas State 2nd: Iowa State 3rd: Wisconsin 4th: Armour 5th: Kansas 6th: Purdue 7th: Nebraska 8th: Oklahoma State 9th: Clarkson 10th: Minnesota |
1969 | 1st: Kansas State 2nd: Marquette 3rd: Ohio State 4th: Oklahoma State 5th: Armour 6th: Iowa State 7th: Penn State 8th: Michigan 9th: Kansas 10th: Wisconsin |
1970 | 1st: Kansas State 2nd: Ohio State 3rd: Marquette 4th: Missouri Mines 5th: Minnesota 6th: UWM 7th: Iowa State 8th: Kansas 9th: Oklahoma State 10th: Armour |
1971 | 1st: Kansas State 2nd: Rose Tech 3rd: Minnesota 4th: Cornell 5th: Kansas 6th: Armour 7th: Kentucky (Only 7 chapters entered the competition) |
1972 | 1st: Kansas State 2nd: Wisconsin 3rd: Armour 4th: Cincinnati and 5th: Minnesota (tie) 6th: Missouri Mines 7th: Ohio State 8th: Oklahoma State 9th: Kentucky 10th: Purdue |
1973 | 1st: Cincinnati 2nd: Kansas State 3rd: Purdue 4th: Missouri Mines 5th: Oklahoma State 6th: Minnesota 7th: Wisconsin 8th: Armour 9th: Ohio State 10th: Kentucky |
1974 | 1st: Cincinnati 2nd: Kansas State 3rd: Missouri Mines 4th: Armour 5th: Kentucky 6th: Marquette 7th: Mississippi State 8th: Cornell 9th: Ohio State 10th: UCLA |
1975 | 1st: Cincinnati 2nd: Iowa State 3rd: Kansas State 4th: Missouri Mines 5th: MSOE 6th: Armour 7th: Ohio State 8th: Toledo 9th: Cornell 10th: Minnesota |
1976 | 1st: Purdue 2nd: Cornell 3rd: Kansas State 4th: Missouri Mines 5th: Penn State 6th: MSOE 7th: Iowa State 8th: Northwestern 9th: Michigan 10th: UCLA |
1977 | 1st: Iowa State 2nd: Michigan 3rd: Mississippi State 4th: Kansas 5th: Purdue 6th: Cornell 7th: Penn State 8th: Northwestern 9th: Missouri Mines 10th: Armour |
1978 | 1st: Michigan 2nd: Purdue 3rd: Minnesota 4th: Iowa State 5th: Kansas State 6th: Michigan State 7th: Oklahoma State 8th: Nebraska 9th: Cincinnati 10th: Kansas |
1979 | 1st: Minnesota 2nd: Kansas State 3rd: Michigan 4th: Illinois 5th: Michigan State 6th: UWM 7th: Marquette and Iowa State (tie) 8th: Purdue 9th: Cincinnati 10th: Penn State (After the awards were given, it was discovered that Iowa State was mistakenly left out of its deserved 7th place ranking.) |
1980 | 1st: Purdue 2nd: Ohio State 3rd: Michigan State 4th: MSOE 5th: VPI 6th: Missouri Mines 7th: Cincinnati 8th: Marquette 9th: Penn State 10th: Wisconsin Most Improved: MSOE |
1981 | 1st: Purdue 2nd: Cincinnati 3rd: VPI 4th: Wisconsin 5th: Nebraska 6th: Michigan 7th: Kansas State 8th: Kansas 9th: Iowa State 10th: Missouri Mines Most Improved: Kansas State |
1982 | 1st: Purdue 2nd: VPI 3rd: Michigan 4th: Rose Tech 5th: Missouri Mines 6th: Pittsburgh 7th: Penn State 8th: Cincinnati 9th: RIT 10th: Nebraska Most Improved: Pittsburgh |
1983 | 1st: Michigan 2nd: Colorado State 3rd: Minnesota 4th: Purdue 5th: Illinois 6th: RIT 7th: Pittsburgh 8th: Kansas 9th: Cincinnati 10th: Wisconsin Most Improved: Minnesota |
1984 | 1st: Armour 2nd: Illinois 3rd: Minnesota 4th: Michigan 5th: South Dakota Mines 6th: Pittsburgh 7th: Ohio State 8th: Purdue 9th: RIT 10th: Kansas State Most Improved: Kansas State |
1985 | 1st: Colorado State and Illinois (tie) 2nd: Michigan 3rd: Pittsburgh 4th: Oklahoma State 5th: Purdue 6th: Cincinnati 8th: Minnesota 9th: RIT 10th: Ohio State (Due to an error in the original calculations, Illinois was originally placed seventh and CSU first. After the error was discovered, Illinois and CSU were declared joint winners) Most Improved: Colorado State |
1986 | 1st: Michigan 2nd: Illinois 3rd: Armour 4th: Pittsburgh 5th: Cincinnati 6th: Minnesota 7th: Purdue 8th: Oklahoma State 9th: South Dakota Mines 10th: RIT Most Improved: Armour |
1987 | 1st: Minnesota 2nd: Rose Tech 3rd: UTA 4th: Toledo 5th: VPI 6th: Iowa State 7th: South Dakota Mines 8th: Michigan 9th: Purdue 10th: MSOE and UWM (tie) Most Improved: Toledo |
1988 | 1st: Toledo 2nd: Cincinnati 3rd: Minnesota 4th: Rose Tech 5th: Michigan 6th: UCLA 7th: Purdue 8th: Ohio State 9th: Mississippi State 10th: Kansas Most Improved: UCLA |
1989 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Kansas 3rd: Toledo 4th: Armour 5th: Purdue 6th: Penn State 7th: Cincinnati 8th: South Dakota Mines 9th: Nebraska and Oklahoma (tie) Most Improved: Oklahoma |
1990 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Minnesota 3rd: Toledo 4th: Kansas 5th: Purdue 6th: Penn State 7th: Louisville 8th: Michigan Tech 9th: Connecticut 10th: Wisconsin Most Improved: Connecticut |
1991 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Purdue 3rd: Nebraska 4th: South Dakota Mines 5th: Wisconsin 6th: Penn State 7th: RIT 8th: Illinois 9th: Michigan Tech 10th: Colorado State Most Improved: Nebraska |
1992 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Minnesota 3rd: Nebraska 4th: Michigan State 5th: Missouri Mines 6th: Marquette 7th: RIT 8th: Tri-State 9th: Iowa State 10th: Akron Most Improved: Michigan State |
1993 | 1st: Minnesota 2nd: Armour 3rd: Nebraska 4th: Rose Tech 5th: Marquette 6th: Purdue 7th: South Dakota Mines 8th: Kansas State 9th: Tri-State 10th: Toledo Most Improved: Armour |
1994 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Minnesota 3rd: Marquette 4th: Cincinnati 5th: Penn State 6th: Purdue 7th: UWM 8th: Oklahoma 9th: Wisconsin 10th: Nebraska Most Improved: Oklahoma |
1995 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Cincinnati 3rd: Minnesota 4th: Nebraska 5th: Armour 6th: Purdue 7th: RIT 8th: Northern Illinois 9th: Penn State 10th: Marquette |
1996 | 1st: South Dakota Mines 2nd: Pittsburgh 3rd: Missouri Mines 4th: Minnesota 5th: Rose Tech 6th: Northern Illinois 7th: Kansas State 8th: Michigan Tech 9th: Armour 10th: UWM Most Improved: Pittsburgh |
1997 | 1st: Nebraska 2nd: Marquette 3rd: Rose Tech 4th: Armour 5th: Minnesota 6th: Cincinnati 7th: South Dakota Mines 8th: Pittsburgh 9th: Louisville and Purdue (tie) 10th: Oklahoma Most Improved: Marquette (Due to an error in calculations, Purdue was originally left out of its deserved 9th place ranking.) |
1998 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Pittsburgh 3rd: South Dakota Mines 4th: Kansas State 5th: Oklahoma 6th: Cincinnati 7th: Louisville 8th: Wisconsin 9th: Northern Illinois 10th: Iowa State Most Improved: Iowa State |
1999 | 1st: Iowa State 2nd: Marquette 3rd: Kansas State 4th: Tri-State 5th: Rose Tech 6th: South Dakota Mines 7th: Michigan State 8th: Cincinnati 9th: Purdue 10th: Minnesota Most Improved: Tri-State and Michigan State (tie) |
2000 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Iowa State 3rd: Marquette 4th: UCLA 5th: Wisconsin 6th: Northern Illinoi 7th: Minnesota 8th: Penn State 9th: Kansas State 10th: Nebraska Most improved: Ohio State |
2001 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Louisville 3rd: Cincinnati 4th: South Dakota Mines 5th: Marquette 6th: Purdue 7th: Minnesota 8th: UCLA 9th: Ohio State 10th: Iowa State Most improved: Toledo |
2002 | 1st: Iowa State 2nd: Rose Tech 3rd: Louisville 4th: Cincinnati 5th: UWM 6th: RIT 7th: Minnesota 8th: NIU 9th: Oklahoma 10th: Purdue Most Improved: RIT |
2003 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Armour 3rd: Iowa State 4th: Louisville 5th: Oklahoma 6th: MSOE 7th: Colorado State 8th: UCLA 9th: Purdue 10th: NIU Most Improved: Colorado State |
2004 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Armour 3rd: Tri-State 4th: Colorado State 5th: Illinois 6th: Iowa State 7th: NIU 8th: Toledo 9th: Louisville 10th: Marquette Most Improved: Illinois and Toledo (tie) |
2005 | 1st: Rose Tech 2nd: Tri-State 3rd: Michigan State 4th: Armour 5th: UWM 6th: Purdue 7th: MSOE 8th: Minnesota 9th: Marquette 10th: Louisville Most Improved: Michigan State |
2006 | 1st: Purdue 2nd: Ohio State 3rd: Armour 4th: Marquette 5th: Kansas 6th: Wisconsin 7th: Kansas State 8th: Penn State 9th: UMBC 10th: UCLA |